Abstract
Background Refractory and unexplained chronic cough (RCC; UCC) pose significant clinical challenges, impairing patients’ quality of life; however, defining RCC precisely remains elusive. Hence, this study aimed to assess RCC and UCC prevalence among patients referred to our cough centre and to analyse RCC prevalence relative to its definition.
Methods This prospective cohort study included all patients who were diagnosed at a cough clinic between 2018–2022. The response to therapy was measured based on the reduction in cough severity (via the Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]) and improvement in cough-related quality of life (via the Leicester cough questionnaire [LCQ]). RCC was defined as persistent cough severity, with none or minimal improvement (ΔVAS<30 mm) after ≥2 treatment attempts and cough severity ≥40/100 mm (VAS).
Results Of 201 patients treated for chronic cough, only three (1.5%) were diagnosed with UCC. Among 166 patients monitored for therapy response, 71 (42.8%) experienced a cough severity reduction in VAS ≥30 mm, while 100 (60.2%) showed an improvement in LCQ ≥1.5 points.
Based on the basic RCC definition, 51 of 166 patients (30.7%) were diagnosed. If applying stricter criteria (persistent severe cough ≥40 mm [VAS], insufficient therapy response <30 mm reduction [VAS], and <1.5 point improvement [LCQ]), RCC would be diagnosed in 45 subjects (27.1%).
Conclusions RCC is common in patients referred to cough clinics. The prevalence of RCC differs slightly depending on the diagnostic criteria. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the definition of RCC used in routine practice.
Footnotes
This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.
Conflict of interest: All authors declare no conflict of interest related to the manuscript.
This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.
- Received March 16, 2024.
- Accepted April 26, 2024.
- Copyright ©The authors 2024
This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org