Abstract
Bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammatory airway disease. Brensocatib, an oral, reversible inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase 1 (DPP1), reduces pulmonary inflammation by preventing the activation of neutrophil serine proteases. In the phase 2 WILLOW trial, brensocatib prolonged time to first exacerbation in patients with bronchiectasis. In this post-hoc analysis we compare clinical outcomes in patients from WILLOW according to baseline disease characteristics.
Adults with bronchiectasis treated with brensocatib (10 or 25 mg) or placebo once-daily were analysed by baseline Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI) score (≤4 [mild], 5–8 [moderate], or ≥9 [severe]), exacerbation history (2 or ≥3 in the prior year), blood eosinophil count (<300 cells·µL−1 or ≥300 cells·µL−1), long-term macrolide use (≥6 months; no or yes), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa culture at screening (negative or positive). End points were time to first exacerbation, annualised exacerbation rate, change in lung function from baseline, and safety. All patients who received brensocatib were pooled and compared with placebo.
Treatment with brensocatib versus placebo was associated with a longer time to first exacerbation (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], BSI: ≤4, 0.28 [0.08–0.96]; 5–8, 0.75 [0.35–1.60]; ≥9, 0.61 [0.35–1.04]; prior exacerbations: 2, 0.56 [0.34–0.90]; ≥3, 0.71 [0.32–1.59]; blood eosinophils/µL: <300, 0.66 [0.42–1.06]; ≥300, 0.49 [0.20–1.20]; long-term macrolide use: no, 0.60 [0.38–0.94]; yes, 0.60 [0.25–1.45]; Pseudomonas aeruginosa culture: negative, 0.54 [0.32–0.92]; positive, 0.68 [0.37–1.27]). Safety results were similar across subgroups.
Patients treated with brensocatib had a numerically longer time to first exacerbation and reduced annualised rate of exacerbation versus placebo across all key baseline disease characteristics.
Footnotes
This manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.
Conflict of interest: James D. Chalmers reports receiving grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Zambon, and Insmed Incorporated, a grant from Gilead, and personal fees from Novartis and Chiesi.
Conflict of interest: Michael R. Loebinger reports receiving consulting fees from 30 T, AN2 Therapeutics, Armata, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Electromed, Insmed Incorporated, MannKind, Parion Sciences, Recode Therapeutics, Savara, and Zambon.
Conflict of interest: Ariel Teper, Carlos Fernandez, Sebastian Fucile, Melanie Lauterio, and Vivian H. Shih are employees and shareholders in Insmed Incorporated.
Conflict of interest: Roald van der Laan was an employee of Insmed Incorporated at the time of this study.
Conflict of interest: Pamela J. McShane is site primary investigator for clinical trials with the following pharmaceutical companies: AN2 Therapeutics, Armata, Boehringer Ingelheim, Insmed Incorporated, Paratek, and Renovion; trial steering committee membership for Boehringer Ingelheim and Insmed Incorporated; and consulting fee from Insmed Incorporated.
Conflict of interest: Charles S. Haworth reports receiving consultancy/speaker fees from 30 Technology, AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, Chiesi, Infex, Insmed Incorporated, Janssen, LifeArc, Mylan, Pneumagen, Shionogi, Tactile Medical, Vertex, and Zambon.
This is a PDF-only article. Please click on the PDF link above to read it.
- Received February 29, 2024.
- Accepted July 19, 2024.
- Copyright ©The authors 2024
This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions{at}ersnet.org