TY - JOUR T1 - Systematic review of diagnostic methods for acute respiratory distress syndrome JF - ERJ Open Research JO - erjor DO - 10.1183/23120541.00504-2020 VL - 7 IS - 1 SP - 00504-2020 AU - Laura A. Hagens AU - Nanon F.L. Heijnen AU - Marry R. Smit AU - Marcus J. Schultz AU - Dennis C.J.J. Bergmans AU - Ronny M. Schnabel AU - Lieuwe D.J. Bos A2 - , Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/7/1/00504-2020.abstract N2 - Rationale Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is currently diagnosed by the Berlin definition, which does not include a direct measure of pulmonary oedema, endothelial permeability or pulmonary inflammation. We hypothesised that biomarkers of these processes have good diagnostic accuracy for ARDS.Methods Medline and Scopus were searched for original diagnostic studies using minimally invasive testing. Primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy per test and was categorised by control group. The methodological quality was assessed with QUADAS-2 tool. Biomarkers that had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC) of >0.75 and were studied with minimal bias against an unselected control group were considered to be promising.Results Forty-four articles were included. The median AUROCC for all evaluated tests was 0.80 (25th to 75th percentile: 0.72–0.88). The type of control group influenced the diagnostic accuracy (p=0.0095). Higher risk of bias was associated with higher diagnostic accuracy (AUROCC 0.75 for low-bias, 0.77 for intermediate-bias and 0.84 for high-bias studies; p=0.0023). Club cell protein 16 and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products in plasma and two panels with biomarkers of oxidative stress in breath showed good diagnostic accuracy in low-bias studies that compared ARDS patients to an unselected intensive care unit (ICU) population.Conclusion This systematic review revealed only four diagnostic tests fulfilling stringent criteria for a promising biomarker in a low-bias setting. For implementation into the clinical setting, prospective studies in a general unselected ICU population with good methodological quality are needed.Accuracy of diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with risk of bias. There is a lack of validated diagnostic tests in an unbiased setting, emphasising the need for quality driven diagnostic research in ARDS. https://bit.ly/2GfPAvf ER -