RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Controlled <em>versus</em> free breathing for multiple breath nitrogen washout in healthy adults
JF ERJ Open Research
JO erjor
FD European Respiratory Society
SP 00435-2020
DO 10.1183/23120541.00435-2020
VO 7
IS 1
A1 Blake M. Handley
A1 Edward Jeagal
A1 Robin E. Schoeffel
A1 Tanya Badal
A1 David G. Chapman
A1 Catherine E. Farrow
A1 Gregory G. King
A1 Paul D. Robinson
A1 Stephen Milne
A1 Cindy Thamrin
YR 2021
UL http://openres.ersjournals.com/content/7/1/00435-2020.abstract
AB Multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBNW) quantifies ventilation heterogeneity. Two distinct protocols are currently used for MBNW testing: “controlled breathing”, with targeted tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate (RR); and “free breathing”, with no constraints on breathing pattern. Indices derived from the two protocols (functional residual capacity (FRC), lung clearance index (LCI), Scond, Sacin) have not been directly compared in adults. We aimed to determine whether MBNW indices are comparable between protocols, to identify factors underlying any between-protocol differences and to determine the between-session variabilities of each protocol.We performed MBNW testing by both protocols in 27 healthy adult volunteers, applying the currently proposed correction for VT to Scond and Sacin derived from free breathing. To establish between-session variability, we repeated testing in 15 volunteers within 3 months.While FRC was comparable between controlled versus free breathing 2.92 (0.86) versus 2.94 (0.89) L, p=0.75), indices of ventilation heterogeneity derived from the two protocols were not, with poor correlation for Scond (r=0.18, p=0.36) and significant bias for Sacin (0.057 (0.021) L−1 versus 0.085 (0.038) L−1, p=0.0004). Between-protocol differences in Sacin were related to differences in the breathing pattern, i.e. VT (p=0.004) and RR (p=0.01), rather than FRC. FRC and LCI showed good between-session repeatability, but Scond and Sacin from free breathing showed poor repeatability with wide limits of agreement.These findings have implications for the ongoing clinical implementation of MBNW, as they demonstrate that Scond and Sacin from free breathing, despite VT correction, are not equivalent to the controlled breathing protocol. The poor between-session repeatability of Scond during free breathing may limit its clinical utility.Phase 3 slopes indices derived from “free breathing” and “controlled breathing” MBNW protocols are not comparable, and differences are related to breathing patterns. These findings have implications for the ongoing clinical implementation of MBNW. https://bit.ly/35oQYnW