%0 Journal Article %A Vitaly O. Kheyfets %A Andrew J. Sweatt %A Mardi Gomberg-Maitland %A Dunbar D. Ivy %A Robin Condliffe %A David G. Kiely %A Allan Lawrie %A Bradley A. Maron %A Roham T. Zamanian %A Kurt R. Stenmark %T Computational platform for doctor-AI cooperation in PAH prognostication: a pilot study %D 2022 %R 10.1183/23120541.00484-2022 %J ERJ Open Research %P 00484-2022 %X Background Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a heterogenous and complex pulmonary vascular disease associated with substantial morbidity. Machine learning algorithms (used in many PAH risk calculators) can combine established parameters with thousands of circulating biomarkers to optimize PAH prognostication, but these approaches do not offer the clinician insight into what parameters drove the prognosis. The approach proposed in this study diverges from other contemporary phenotyping methods by identifying patient-specific parameters driving clinical risk.Methods We trained a random forest (RF) algorithm to predict 4-year survival risk in a cohort of 167 adult PAH patients evaluated at Stanford university, with 20% withheld for (internal) validation. Another cohort of 38 patients from Sheffield university were used as a secondary (external) validation. Shapley values, borrowed from game theory, were computed to rank the input parameters based on their importance to the predicted risk score for the entire trained RF model (global importance) and for an individual patient (local importance).Results Between the internal and external validation cohorts, the RF model predicted 4-year risk of death/transplant with a sensitivity and specificity between 71.0–100% and 81.0–89.0%, respectively. The model reinforced the importance of established prognostic markers, but also identified novel inflammatory biomarkers that predict risk in some PAH patients.Conclusion These results stress the need for advancing individualized phenotyping strategies that integrate clinical and biochemical data with outcome. The computational platform presented in this study offers a critical step towards personalized medicine in which a clinician can interpret an algorithm's assessment of an individual patient.FootnotesThis manuscript has recently been accepted for publication in the ERJ Open Research. It is published here in its accepted form prior to copyediting and typesetting by our production team. After these production processes are complete and the authors have approved the resulting proofs, the article will move to the latest issue of the ERJOR online. Please open or download the PDF to view this article.Conflict of Interest: None. %U https://openres.ersjournals.com/content/erjor/early/2022/10/27/23120541.00484-2022.full.pdf