TABLE 2

Trial Primary and Secondary Endpoints – Full Analysis Set (FAS)

Full Analysis Set (n=183)StatisticEstimate (95% CI)Treatment EffectEstimate (95% CI)p value
AZITHROSOC
Primary outcome
 Incidence of clinical improvement or live dischargeSubdistribution HR*1.023 (0.758; 1.379)0.8839
-­ at 15 daysCIF# (%)78.2% (69.5%; 84.6%)81.3% (69.0%; 89.0%)
-­ at 29 daysCIF# (%)86.6% (78.9%; 91.6%)89.1% (77.8%; 94.8%)
 Time to sustained clinical improvement or live dischargeMedian (Days)6 (6; 8)8 (6; 10)
Secondary Outcomes (compared to FAS, total n-values may be lower than n=119 for AZITHRO and n=64 for SOC due to missing values**)
 Clinical status at day 15n/N (%)Common OR of having lower clinical status at day 15$0.83 (0.47; 1.53)0.5776
1. Not hosp., no limitations14/97 (14.58%)11/53 (20.75%)
2. Not hosp., limitations50/97 (51.55%)28/53 (52.83%)
3. Hosp., no suppl. oxygen7/97 (7.22%)2/53 (3.77%)
4. Hosp., requiring oxygen10/97 (10.31%)4/53 (7.55%)
5. Hosp., NIV5/97 (5.15%)3/53 (5.66%)
6. Hospitalised, MV or ECMO7/97 (7.22%)4/53 (7.55%)
7. Death4/97 (4.12%)1/53 (1.89%)
Cumulative clinical status up to day 15Geometric meanΣ42.61 (39.66; 45.77)42.60 (38.64; 46.98)Treatment ratio1.00 (0.90; 1.12)0.9508
 All-cause mortality
-­ 15-daysKM (%)3.4% (1.3%; 8.7%)1.6% (0.2%; 10.6%)Hazard Ratio1.799 (0.201; 16.09)0.5996
-­ 29-daysKM (%)7.6% (4.0%; 14.0%)6.5% (2.5%; 16.3%)Hazard Ratio1.109 (0.339; 3.628)0.8666
 ICU (29 days)
-­ Incidence (all patients)CIF# (%)26.1% (18.5%; 34.2%)23.4% (13.9%; 34.4%)Subdistribution HR*1.066 (0.572; 1.985)0.8412
-­ Duration of ICU stay (ICU admitted patients)Median (days)11 (7; 18)17 (3; 28)Subdistribution HR for live discharge from ICU*1.293 (0.661; 2.529)0.4534
 Mechanical ventilation (29 days)
-­ Incidence (all patients)CIF# (%)12.0% (6.9%; 18.6%)15.6% (8.0%; 25.6%)Subdistribution HR*0.738 (0.313; 1.741)0.4838
-­ Duration of MV (MV patients)Median (Days)13 (NC; NC)19 (NC; NC)Subdistribution HR for live weaning from MV*0.897 (0.263; 3.034)0.8609
 Supplemental oxygen (29 days)
-­ Incidence (all patients)CIF# (%)83.2% (75.1%; 88.9%)79.7% (67.4%; 87.8%)Subdistribution HR*0.998 (0.837; 1.191)0.7811
-­ Duration of supplemental oxygen (patients with supplemental oxygen)Median (Days)6 (5; 8)7 (5;11)Subdistribution HR for live weaning from oxygen*1.042 (0.737; 1.479)0.9465
 Hospital stay (29 days)Subdistribution HR for live hospital discharge*
-­ Occurrence of live hospital dischargeCIF# (%)85.8% (78.0%; 91.0%)84.4% (72.5%; 91.4%)1.064 (0.780; 1.451)0.6954
-­ Duration of hospital stay (Days)Median (Days)7 (6; 8)8 (6; 9)
Safety Outcome
 Combined cardiac endpoint (hs-Troponin >0.5 ng/ml and/or ventricular arrhythmia requiring intervention and/or sudden cardiac death)n/N (%)24/119 (20.17%)12/64 (18.75%)Odds Ratio¥1.40 (0.61; 3.19)0.4265
Exploratory Outcomes
 Normal CT at 5–7 weeksn/N (%)25/75 (33.33%)12/40 (30.00%)Odds Ratio1.56 (0.64;3.79)0.3233
 DLCO (% predicted)Estimated meanΩ (%)66.49 (59.96; 73.02)67.00 (57.91; 76.09)Treatment difference###0.22 (−11.1; 11.51)0.9695
 6-min walking testEstimated meanΩ (meters)496.5 (465.0; 528.0)456.3 (413.2; 499.3)Treatment difference###32.51 (−21.2; 86.25)0.2383
  • Abbreviations: NIV: non-invasive ventilation, MV: mechanical ventilation, ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

  • #Event rates were estimated as cumulative incidence functions (CIF), taking into account the competing risk of death.

  • *Score>1 favours azithromycin. Hazard ratio was obtained using a Fine & Gray model for competing risk data including treatment, study site and study period as factors.

  • $Score>1 favours azithromycin. Odds ratio was obtained from a multinomial logistic regression with factors for treatment, disease severity and Clinical Status on Day 0.

  • ΣGeometric mean was obtained using a general linear model including treatment as factor.

  • Score>1 favours SOC. Treatment ratio was calculated as the ratio of geometric means, obtained using a general linear model including treatment, study site, study period and clinical status on Day 0 as factors. (Notes: Data were log-transformed prior to statistical analysis).

  • Score>1 favours SOC. Hazard ratio was obtained using a Fine & Gray model for competing risk data including treatment, study site and study period as factors.

  • Score>1 favours SOC. Hazard ratio was obtained using Log-Rank test after event rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

  • Score>1 favours azithromycin. Odds ratios were obtained using logistic regression including treatment, study site and study period as factors in the model.

  • ¥Score>1 favours SOC. Odds ratios were obtained using logistic regression including treatment, study site and study period as factors in the model.

  • ΩObtained using a general linear model including treatment as factor.

  • ΔScore>1 favours SOC. Hazard ratio was obtained using a Fine & Gray model for competing risk data including treatment, study site and study period as factors

  • ###Higher score (> 0) favours azithromycin. Obtained using a general linear model including treatment, study site and period as factors.

  • **Missing data are accounted for by multiple imputation.