TABLE 2

Core features of studies of post-operative outcomes, comparing patients treated and not treated with peri-operative pirfenidone (poPirf)

First author [ref.]Cohort size, treated and untreated armsStudy designPost-operative AE-IPFPost-operative mortality
Iwata [101]n=50
poPirf n=33
No poPirf n=17
Retrospective poPirf for 4 weeks before and after surgeryReduction in AE-IPF with poPirf at 30 days (0% versus 10.5%, p=0.07) and at 90 days (3.2% versus 21.1%, p=0.04)IPF progression-free survival curves difference between groups was statistically marginal (p=0.0676), better in the poPirf group
poPirf was numerically, but not significantly, associated with better IPF progression-free survival
Sekihara [102]n=56
poPirf n=36
No poPirf n=20
Retrospective poPirf for 4 weeks before surgery; “longer periods” after surgeryReduction in AE-IPF with poPirf (8%) compared with no poPirf (20%)
Nonsignificant trend (p=0.21)
Reduced mortality in poPirf group (p=0.04)
Kanayama [103]n=100
poPirf n=28
No poPirf n=72
RetrospectivesNo effect in low-risk group
Reduction in AE-IPF with poPirf in high-risk group at 30 days (p=0.11) and at 90 days (p<0.05)
Disease-specific death (including due to acute exacerbation): no significant difference at 1 year (83% in poPirf and 83.7% in non-poPirf) or 3 years (66.4% in poPirf and 47.8 % in non-poPirf) (p=0.481)
Progression-free survival: no significant difference at 1 year (61.5% in the poPirf and 55.4% in non-poPirf groups) or 3 years (46.1% in the poPirf and 42.8% in non-poPirf groups) (p=0.364)

AE-IPF: acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.