Clinical study
Superior vena caval obstruction is it a medical emergency?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(81)90823-8Get rights and content

Abstract

With the question in mind is superior vena caval obstruction a medical emergency, we reviewed 107 cases of superior vena caval obstruction in adult patients. We sought details of the time duration between the onset of symptoms and the treatment, and examined the complications and survival of patients with this disorder. Fifteen percent of the cases developed from benign causes. In 41 percent there was a previously recognized disease as the etiology. Benign disorders required longer to make the diagnosis. No serious complication resulted from the superior vena caval obstruction itself nor investigative procedures leading to the diagnosis despite, in some cases, a prolonged period between the onset of symptoms and the initiation of therapy. Prognosis and response to treatment were dependent on the underlying cause of the superior vena caval obstruction. Although several cases of tracheal obstruction were included in this series, we did not address the question of whether tracheal obstruction is or is not a medical emergency. No support was found for the notion that superior vena caval obstruction in itself represents a radiotherapeutic emergency.

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (187)

  • Superior Vena Cava Syndrome

    2019, Abeloff’s Clinical Oncology
View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was supported in part by a grant from the Royal Edward Laurentian Foundation and the American Thoracic Society.

1

From the Division of Respiratory Medicine, McGill University Teaching Hospitals, The Montreal Chest Hospital Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal General Hospital, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, and Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

View full text