Elsevier

Annals of Epidemiology

Volume 14, Issue 9, October 2004, Pages 669-675
Annals of Epidemiology

Clinical pathway care improves outcomes among patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.01.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the impact of a unique evidence-based clinical pathway on six outcomes of care in patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of CAP patients discharged between January 1999 and December 2001, from 31 Adventist Health System institutions nationwide. A total of 22,196 records were available for multivariate analyses. Odds ratios (OR) for the outcomes were calculated and stratified by a unique severity score. The severity score ranged from 1 to 5, where 5 indicated the most severe condition.

Results

Pathway patients were significantly less likely to die in-hospital compared with non-pathway patients in four of the five severity strata (OR in severity level 1 = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.70). In all severity strata, pathway patients were approximately twice as likely as non-pathway patients to receive blood cultures and appropriate antibiotic therapy. Among patients who were classified as severity level 1, pathway patients experienced an 80% reduction in the odds of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.12–0.33).

Conclusions

Patients who were placed on pneumonia clinical pathway care were much more likely than non-pathway patients to have favorable outcomes of care.

Introduction

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common and potentially lethal disease. It remains so in spite of the availability of potent antimicrobial agents and effective vaccines. Pneumonia (together with influenza) is the seventh leading cause of death in the US (1) and the major cause of death due to infectious diseases. In the United States annually there are over 65,000 deaths due to pneumonia and influenza, which is 2.7% of all deaths in this country (1).

According to year 2000 vital statistics, pneumonia is the third most common cause of hospital discharge in the US following heart disease and baby delivery (2). Pneumonia accounts for 1.3 million hospital discharges annually (2). The national average length of stay (LOS) for CAP patients is 5.9 days for all patients and 6.5 days for Medicare patients (2). The total estimated treatment cost for an episode of CAP managed in the hospital is over $7500 (US dollars) (3). Although mortality has ranged from 2% to 30% among CAP patients in a variety of studies (for patients whose disease is severe enough to warrant treatment in the hospital setting), the average is approximately 14% 4., 5..

Several international organizations have developed guidelines for the diagnosis and management of CAP 5., 6., 7., 8.. They provide evidence-based and consensus derived statements of optimum care for patients with CAP. The challenge for physicians and hospitals is how to transform the evidence from paper to practice. This can be accomplished by converting the knowledge contained in these international guidelines into clinical pathways, protocols, and order sets that are utilized by physicians and hospital staff to guide CAP patient management. The goals are to reduce process variation and improve patient outcomes in both quality and the cost-effectiveness. There is a growing body of literature that demonstrates that this strategy helps hospitals improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of CAP patient care 9., 10., 11.. This was the course chosen by Adventist Health System (AHS). AHS created an evidence-based, standardized approach for the care of CAP patients across a national healthcare system. This was accomplished in community, non-academic hospitals with private practicing physicians. The study included patients admitted to 31 geographically dispersed hospitals. A retrospective review in a large cohort of CAP patients examined the effect of the AHS pneumonia clinical pathway on six measures that involved process, clinical, and financial outcomes.

Section snippets

Study design and pneumonia pathway

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to examine the associations between a unique evidence-based clinical pathway and the following six measures involving process and clinical and financial outcomes:

  • Process:

    • 1.

      Performance of blood cultures during the hospital stay

    • 2.

      Use of guideline recommended antibiotics (based on Infectious Disease Society of America [IDSA] recommendations—see further definition below)

  • Clinical outcome:

    • 3.

      Respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation

    • 4.

      Hospital mortality

Results

A total of 5219 patients (24% of the entire cohort) had been placed on the pneumonia pathway protocol (Table 1). Seventy-five years was the median age of both pathway and non-pathway patients. Approximately half of the patients were women (Table 1). The majority of the patients were of white race. Over a quarter of the patients in the pathway and non-pathway groups had congestive heart failure. As discussed above, the analysis strategy utilized a comprehensive severity measure (MEDai severity

Discussion

In this study we examined the relationship between a pneumonia pathway protocol and six important process and outcomes measures including mortality and LOS. We observed clinically- and statistically-significant results in all six of our crude analyses. In stratified analyses adjusted for severity of illness, 26 of 30 ORs indicated that the pneumonia pathway protocol was significantly (p⩽0.05) associated with beneficial outcomes.

We found that in three out of five severity strata, patients who

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Scott Weingarten, Dr. Richard Root, and Dr. Richard Carroll for their review of our manuscript and suggestions for improvement. Dr. Weingarten is associated with Cedars-Sinai Health System, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, and Zynx Health, Inc., Beverly Hills, CA. Dr. Root is associated Harborview Medical Center and the University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. Dr. Carroll is the Medical Director for Quality, Midwest Region,

References (16)

  • S.R. Cole

    Analysis of complex survey data using SAS

    Comput Methods Programs Biomed

    (2001)
  • A.M. Minino et al.

    Deaths: Final Data for 2000. National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol. 50, No. 15

    (2002)
  • M.J. Hall et al.

    2000 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics. No. 329

    (2002)
  • J.R. Lave et al.

    The cost of treating patients with community-acquired pneumonia

    Semin Respir Crit Care Med

    (1999)
  • M.J. Fine et al.

    Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia

    JAMA

    (1996)
  • L.A. Mandell et al.

    Canadian guidelines for the initial management of community-acquired pneumonia: An evidence-based update by the Canadian infectious diseases society and the Canadian Thoracic Society

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2000)
  • J.G. Bartlett et al.

    Infectious diseases society of America guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2000)
  • M.S. Niederman et al.

    Guidelines for the management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2001)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (58)

  • Antimicrobial stewardship capacity and manpower needs in the Asia Pacific

    2021, Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
    Citation Excerpt :

    Using institutional epidemiology data and antibiograms can promote use of narrower-spectrum empirical agents, earlier switch to oral therapy and shorter duration of treatment. Numerous studies demonstrated that these practice guidelines reduced mortality, length of stay and overall costs [21,24–27]. Implementation of surgical prophylaxis guidelines significantly reduces antimicrobial use without affecting surgical site infection rates [28].

  • What is the Role of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Improving Outcomes of Patients with CAP?

    2013, Infectious Disease Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    The benefit of PCT-guided therapy, both clinical and financial, must be assessed compared with other stewardship interventions that have been shown to be effective in decreasing antibiotic exposure before recommending that it replace them. Several before-and-after studies have shown that increasing awareness of CAP treatment guidelines for empiric therapy and implementing clinical pathways reinforcing these guidelines improve patient outcomes, including mortality.55–58 Fewer studies evaluating antimicrobial stewardship efforts directed at switch therapy and reducing the duration of CAP therapy have been performed.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Our research was entirely internally funded by Adventist Health System.

View full text