Changes in the calibre of the upper airway and the surrounding structures after maxillomandibular advancement for obstructive sleep apnoea
Introduction
Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) is used in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea as an effective alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).1 While CPAP remains the gold standard because it is highly efficacious, other options are needed because the clinical effectiveness of CPAP is often limited because patients find it difficult to tolerate.2 MMA advances the maxilla and mandible to increase the calibre of the upper airway, thereby preventing its collapse during sleep. However, the mechanisms by which MMA improves sleep apnoea are not well understood.
Although MMA has been shown to improve the calibre of the upper airway,3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 these studies predominantly used cephalometric radiographs for assessment. Such measurements have the disadvantage that the images are usually taken with the patient upright (not a natural sleeping position), and a lateral cephalometric view of the airway limits its 3-dimensional form by not capturing the width of the airway. The surrounding structures (soft palate, tongue, and hyoid), the interaction between the upper airway and the surrounding structures, and the response to treatment, have never been systematically studied to our knowledge in patients treated by MMA.
Computed tomography (CT) is probably one of the best methods for assessment of the 3-dimensional structures of the upper airway, facial skeleton, and surroundings. In this study we aimed to evaluate the mechanism that underlies MMA in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea, and we used CT to assess the effects on the calibre of the upper airway and on the surrounding structures when the patient was awake.
Section snippets
Patients
We prospectively recruited adult patients with obstructive sleep apnoea from the Sleep Centre for primary treatment with MMA. Patients were included if they had at least 2 symptoms of sleep apnoea (snoring, witnessed apnoeas, fragmented sleep, or daytime sleepiness) and they had moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnoea on nocturnal polysomnography (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥ 15 n/h).15, 16 Patients were excluded if they had cleft palate, genetic syndromes, or were unable to comply with the
Results
The sample comprised 16 patients, 12 men and 4 women, mean (SD) age 33 (7.9) years (range 22–48) and mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) 22 (3.3) (range 17–28). All but one patient had skeletal Class II deformities. The mean duration of follow-up was 12 (8) months. Although most patients lost some weight postoperatively, their BMI had returned to baseline by the time of postoperative polysomnography (p = 0.4).
Discussion
We have challenged the traditional thinking that the primary mechanism of MMA is to increase the anteroposterior dimensions of the velopharynx and oropharynx by advancing the soft palate and tongue, thereby preventing collapse of the upper airway during sleep. One key finding was that MMA improves the calibre of the upper airway, as a result of increased volumes in the velopharynx, oropharynx, and hypopharynx and is mediated by increases in their anteroposterior and lateral dimensions. These
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan (CMRP390742).
References (25)
Surgical therapy for adult obstructive sleep apnea
Sleep Med Rev
(2005)- et al.
Maxillary, mandibular, and hyoid advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a review of 40 patients
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1990) Maxillomandibular advancement surgery in a site-specific treatment approach for obstructive sleep apnea in 50 consecutive patients
Chest
(1999)- et al.
Three-dimensional changes in upper airways of patients with obstructive sleep apnea following maxillomandibular advancement
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2007) - et al.
Effectiveness of maxillo-mandibular advancement in obstructive sleep apnoea patients with and without skeletal anomalies
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2010) - et al.
Three-dimensional computed tomographic airway analysis of patients with obstructive sleep apnea treated by maxillomandibular advancement
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2011) - et al.
Counterclockwise rotation of the occlusal plane in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2011) - et al.
Upper Airway length decreases after maxillomandibular advancement in patients with obstructive sleep apnea
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2011) - et al.
Cephalometric measurement of upper airway length correlates with the presence and severity of obstructive sleep apnoea
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2010) - et al.
Therapy with nCPAP: incomplete elimination of sleep related breathing disorder
Eur Respir J
(2000)
Maxillofacial surgery and obstructive sleep apnea: a review of 80 patients
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Maxillomandibular advancement surgery in 23 patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Cited by (47)
Modified maxillomandibular advancement surgery for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea: a scoping review
2024, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgerySurgical Correction of Maxillofacial Skeletal Deformities
2023, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryComparison of airway changes after maxillomandibular advancement with or without genial tubercle advancement in obstructive sleep apnea using cone-beam computed tomography
2022, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsThe correlation of maxillomandibular advancement and airway volume change in obstructive sleep apnea using cone beam computed tomography
2021, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryUpper airways after mandibular advancement orthognathic surgery: A 4-year follow-up
2021, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsMaxillomandibular advancement versus multilevel surgery for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2021, Sleep Medicine ReviewsCitation Excerpt :The observed superiority of MMA over MLS in treating OSA is explained by enlargement of the entire retropalatal and retrolingual airway by expanding the skeletal framework, while MLS cannot. Currently, there are a few studies [25,31,40] reporting the significant increases in pharyngeal airway volume (PAV) in OSA patients treated with MMA, by 60.5%, 35.7% and 35.4%, respectively. However, to our knowledge, only Chiffer et al. [54] quantitatively measured the volumetric changes in upper airway before and after MLS for treating OSA.