Mechanisms of asthma and allergic inflammation
Computed tomographic scan–diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease–emphysema: Eotaxin-1 is associated with bronchodilator response and extent of emphysema

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.045Get rights and content

Background

Bronchodilator responses are a hallmark of asthma and a subset of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We evaluated subjects with COPD and computed tomographic (CT) scan evidence of emphysema to determine the biomarker profile associated with a bronchodilator response.

Objective

We investigated whether subjects with COPD and a bronchodilator response had increased levels of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid eosinophil biomarkers, TH2 cytokines, CC chemokines, and serum allergen-specific IgE.

Methods

All patients with COPD and control subjects (n = 31) had chest CT scans to detect emphysema and subsequent pulmonary function studies, BAL for biomarkers, and serum IgE measurements.

Results

CT scan score, FEV1, carbon monoxide single-breath diffusion capacity, and BAL fluid neutrophil biomarker levels were similar in subjects with COPD who had or did not have a bronchodilator response of greater than 12%. In contrast, levels of BAL fluid eosinophil biomarkers (eosinophil cationic protein [ECP] and eotaxin-1) were greater in patients with COPD with a bronchodilator response, whereas TH2 cytokines were not detectable in any patients with COPD. BAL fluid ECP and eotaxin-1 levels correlated with CT scan extent of emphysema. Immunostaining of COPD lung sections from a separate cohort of subjects with COPD and healthy subjects demonstrated epithelial expression of eotaxin-1 but no lung expression of IL-4 or IL-5.

Conclusion

Subjects with COPD diagnosed on the basis of the presence of emphysema on CT scan who have a bronchodilator response have increased levels of BAL ECP and eotaxin-1 but not TH2 cytokines.

Clinical implications

Eosinophil biomarkers (ECP-1 and eotaxin-1) might identify a subset of subjects with COPD with emphysema on CT scans who have a bronchodilator response and an increased extent of emphysema on CT scanning.

Section snippets

Study subjects

Subjects with COPD were recruited based on chest CT scan evidence of emphysema, pulmonary function studies, and the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) clinical evaluation (history of chronic cough, sputum production, and dyspnea).10 They also completed a standardized COPD questionnaire (ie, St George Questionnaire; possible score, 0-100).11 Healthy individuals were nonsmokers who had no evidence of disease on history and physical examination and had a normal chest CT

COPD study subject CT scan results, pulmonary function test results, and clinical characteristics

The subjects with COPD (n = 16) had evidence of significant emphysema based on their chest CT scan results and FEV1 values (Fig 1). In contrast, none of the subjects in either the healthy nonsmoking group (n = 7) or the current smoker group (n = 8) had evidence of COPD on chest CT scan or abnormalities of pulmonary function (Fig 1).

Subjects with COPD-E had a significantly higher chest CT scan score (36.8% ± 4.0% voxels < −920 HU) compared with those of either the healthy nonsmoking group (3.3%

Discussion

In this study we have demonstrated that subjects with GOLD stage III moderate-to-severe COPD-E (enrolled on the basis of CT scan evidence of emphysema rather than pulmonary function testing) express a biomarker profile (ECP-1 and eotaxin-1) associated with bronchodilator responsiveness and also correlated with the extent of emphysema on CT scanning. The significant correlation between BAL fluid ECP level and the extent of emphysema on chest CT scanning raises the possibility that activated

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • Eosinophils in COPD: just another biomarker?

    2017, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    This finding, however, was not replicated in a clinical trial (NCT00162864) of older (>50 years) patients with asthma, COPD, or both. Increased concentrations of CCL11 and ECP have been detected in patients with COPD and have been correlated with bronchodilator-positive emphysema, quantified radiologically.49 Furthermore, the observation of differential expression of the airway microbiome between eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic patients with COPD, during both stable disease50 and acute disease exacerbations,51 further suggests that dysregulation of this complex homoeostatic immunity is likely to feature in the pathogenesis of chronic lung diseases, including COPD.

  • Are asthma and COPD a continuum of the same disease?

    2015, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although this appears to suggest an underlying mechanism distinct from typical eosinophilic inflammation seen in allergic asthma, this relationship is not straightforward.45 For example, hallmarks of asthma such as eosinophil cationic protein-1 and eotaxin-1 are associated with bronchodilator responsiveness in patients with COPD.49 Furthermore, smokers with asthma often demonstrate sputum eosinophilia as opposed to smokers without asthma in whom neutrophils predominate with only modestly increased eosinophils.45,50,51

  • Persistent airway inflammation and emphysema progression on CT scan in ex-smokers observed for 4 years

    2011, Chest
    Citation Excerpt :

    At a later date we enrolled normal individuals who were nonsmokers (n = 7) and normal current smokers (> 20 pack-years) (n = 8). The normal nonsmokers and the normal current smokers had no evidence of disease on history and physical examination, a normal chest CT scan, and normal pulmonary function.16 All the study subjects had blood cotinine levels to verify their smoking status.

  • Biomarkers in COPD

    2010, Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by National Institutes of Health grants HL72342 and GCRC MO1RR000827.

Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: M. Miller, J. Ramsdell, P. J. Friedman, J. Y. Cho, M. Renvall, and D. H. Broide have received grant support from the National Institutes of Health.

View full text