Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A SNAIL1–SMAD3/4 transcriptional repressor complex promotes TGF-β mediated epithelial–mesenchymal transition

Nature Cell Biology volume 11, pages 943–950 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is essential for organogenesis and is triggered during carcinoma progression to an invasive state1. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) cooperates with signalling pathways, such as Ras and Wnt, to induce EMT2,3,4,5, but the molecular mechanisms are not clear. Here, we report that SMAD3 and SMAD4 interact and form a complex with SNAIL1, a transcriptional repressor and promoter of EMT6,7. The SNAIL1–SMAD3/4 complex was targeted to the gene promoters of CAR, a tight-junction protein, and E-cadherin during TGF-β-driven EMT in breast epithelial cells. SNAIL1 and SMAD3/4 acted as co-repressors of CAR, occludin, claudin-3 and E-cadherin promoters in transfected cells. Conversely, co-silencing of SNAIL1 and SMAD4 by siRNA inhibited repression of CAR and occludin during EMT. Moreover, loss of CAR and E-cadherin correlated with nuclear co-expression of SNAIL1 and SMAD3/4 in a mouse model of breast carcinoma and at the invasive fronts of human breast cancer. We propose that activation of a SNAIL1–SMAD3/4 transcriptional complex represents a mechanism of gene repression during EMT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Loss of junction proteins is associated with nuclear accumulation of SNAIL1 and SMAD3/4 during EMT in breast epithelial cells.
Figure 2: SNAIL1 and SMAD3/4 interact and are recruited to CAR and E-cadherin promoters during EMT.
Figure 3: SNAIL1 and SMAD3/4 act as transcriptional co-repressors.
Figure 4: SNAIL1 and SMAD3/4 have essential and cooperative roles as transcriptional repressors of junction components during EMT.
Figure 5: Loss of junction proteins correlates with nuclear co-expression of SNAIL1 and SMAD3/4 in mouse breast carcinomas and at the invasive front in human breast cancer.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thiery, J. P. & Sleeman, J. P. Complex networks orchestrate epithelial–mesenchymal transitions. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 131–142 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Janda, E. et al. Ras and TGF-β cooperatively regulate epithelial cell plasticity and metastasis: dissection of Ras signaling pathways. J. Cell Biol. 156, 299–313 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Massague, J. TGF-β in cancer. Cell 134, 215–230 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nawshad, A., Lagamba, D., Polad, A. & Hay, E. D. Transforming growth factor-β signaling during epithelial-mesenchymal transformation: implications for embryogenesis and tumor metastasis. Cells Tissues Organs 179, 11–23 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pardali, K. & Moustakas, A. Actions of TGF-β as tumor suppressor and pro-metastatic factor in human cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1775, 21–62 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Craene, B., van Roy, F. & Berx, G. Unraveling signalling cascades for the Snail family of transcription factors. Cell Signal 17, 535–547 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yook, J. I. et al. A Wnt-Axin2-GSK3β cascade regulates Snail1 activity in breast cancer cells. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 1398–1406 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Massague, J. How cells read TGF-β signals. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1, 169–178 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bardeesy, N. et al. Smad4 is dispensable for normal pancreas development yet critical in progression and tumor biology of pancreas cancer. Genes Dev. 20, 3130–3146 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nieto, M. A. The snail superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 155–166 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Batlle, E. et al. The transcription factor snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 84–89 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cano, A. et al. The transcription factor snail controls epithelial–mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 76–83 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ikenouchi, J., Matsuda, M., Furuse, M. & Tsukita, S. Regulation of tight junctions during the epithelium–mesenchyme transition: direct repression of the gene expression of claudins/occludin by Snail. J. Cell Sci. 116, 1959–1967 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bachelder, R. E., Yoon, S. O., Franci, C., de Herreros, A. G. & Mercurio, A. M. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 is an endogenous inhibitor of Snail transcription: implications for the epithelial–mesenchymal transition. J. Cell Biol. 168, 29–33 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou, B. P. et al. Dual regulation of Snail by GSK-3β-mediated phosphorylation in control of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 931–940 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Franci, C. et al. Expression of Snail protein in tumor–stroma interface. Oncogene 25, 5134–5144 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Coyne, C. B. & Bergelson, J. M. CAR: a virus receptor within the tight junction. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57, 869–882 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lacher, M. D. et al. Transforming growth factor-β receptor inhibition enhances adenoviral infectability of carcinoma cells via upregulation of Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor in conjunction with reversal of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res. 66, 1648–1657 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Philipson, L. & Pettersson, R. F. The coxsackie-adenovirus receptor—a new receptor in the immunoglobulin family involved in cell adhesion. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 273, 87–111 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Raschperger, E. et al. The coxsackie- and adenovirus receptor (CAR) is an in vivo marker for epithelial tight junctions, with a potential role in regulating permeability and tissue homeostasis. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 1566–1580 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsumoto, K., Shariat, S. F., Ayala, G. E., Rauen, K. A. & Lerner, S. P. Loss of coxsackie and adenovirus receptor expression is associated with features of aggressive bladder cancer. Urology 66, 441–446 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamashita, M., Ino, A., Kawabata, K., Sakurai, F. & Mizuguchi, H. Expression of coxsackie and adenovirus receptor reduces the lung metastatic potential of murine tumor cells. Int. J. Cancer 121, 1690–1696 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Anders, M., Christian, C., McMahon, M., McCormick, F. & Korn, W. M. Inhibition of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway up-regulates expression of the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 63, 2088–2095 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oft, M. et al. TGF-β1 and Ha–Ras collaborate in modulating the phenotypic plasticity and invasiveness of epithelial tumor cells. Genes Dev. 10, 2462–2477 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miettinen, P. J., Ebner, R., Lopez, A. R. & Derynck, R. TGF-β induced transdifferentiation of mammary epithelial cells to mesenchymal cells: involvement of type I receptors. J. Cell Biol. 127, 2021–2036 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mauhin, V., Lutz, Y., Dennefeld, C. & Alberga, A. Definition of the DNA-binding site repertoire for the Drosophila transcription factor SNAIL. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3951–3957 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nawshad, A., Medici, D., Liu, C. C. & Hay, E. D. TGFβ3 inhibits E-cadherin gene expression in palate medial-edge epithelial cells through a Smad2–Smad4–LEF1 transcription complex. J. Cell Sci. 120, 1646–1653 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shirakihara, T., Saitoh, M. & Miyazono, K. Differential regulation of epithelial and mesenchymal markers by δEF1 proteins in epithelial mesenchymal transition induced by TGF-β. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3533–3544 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahoney, K. H., Miller, B. E. & Heppner, G. H. FACS quantitation of leucine aminopeptidase and acid phosphatase on tumor-associated macrophages from metastatic and nonmetastatic mouse mammary tumors. J. Leukoc. Biol. 38, 573–585 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Saitou, M. et al. Mammalian occludin in epithelial cells: its expression and subcellular distribution. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 73, 222–231 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takkunen, M. et al. Snail-dependent and -independent epithelial-mesenchymal transition in oral squamous carcinoma cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 54, 1263–1275 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Meijer, L. et al. GSK-3-selective inhibitors derived from Tyrian purple indirubins. Chem. Biol. 10, 1255–1266 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jinnin, M., Ihn, H. & Tamaki, K. Characterization of SIS3, a novel specific inhibitor of Smad3, and its effect on transforming growth factor-β1-induced extracellular matrix expression. Mol. Pharmacol. 69, 597–607 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pardali, K. et al. Role of Smad proteins and transcription factor Sp1 in p21(Waf1/Cip1) regulation by transforming growth factor-β. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 29244–29256 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hajra, K. M., Chen, D. Y. & Fearon, E. R. The SLUG zinc-finger protein represses E-cadherin in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 62, 1613–1618 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Frey, B. M. et al. High-efficiency gene transfer into ex vivo expanded human hematopoietic progenitors and precursor cells by adenovirus vectors. Blood 91, 2781–2792 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wei, W.Z. et al. Protection against mammary tumor growth by vaccination with full-length, modified human ErbB2 DNA. Int. J. Cancer 81, 748–754 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Carl-Henrik Heldin (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Uppsala Branch) and Ola Hermansson (Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Sweden) for fruitful discussions; Clara Francí (IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona) for the initial immunohistochemical analysis of human tumors; Anita Bergström, Silvia Menéndez and Marta Garrido for excellent technical assistance and Olov Andersson (Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institute) for antibodies. Jonas Fuxe was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Wenner-Gren Foundation, the Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation and an International Union Against Cancer (UICC), American Cancer Society International Fellowship for Beginning Investigators. Theresa Vincent was supported by the Swedish Research Council. Philip Leopold and Ronald Crystal were supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) by PO1 HL59312 and Antonio García de Herreros, Joan Albanell and Federico Rojo by RD06/0020/109, RD06/0020/040, FIS PI061513, SAF2006-00339 and Fundació Privada Cellex.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Stockholm Branch, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden

    Theresa Vincent, Etienne P. A. Neve & Ralf F. Pettersson

  2. Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden

    Jill R. Johnson, Alexander Kukalev, Lennart Philipson & Jonas Fuxe

  3. Oncology Department, Programa de Recerca en Càncer, IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, 08003, Spain

    Federico Rojo, Joan Albanell & Antonio Garcia de Herreros

  4. Institute of Biomedicine/Anatomy, FI-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland

    Ismo Virtanen

  5. Department of Chemistry, Chemical Biology, and Biomedical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, 07030, New Jersey, USA

    Philip L. Leopold

  6. Department of Genetic Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 10065, New York, USA

    Ronald G. Crystal

  7. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Uppsala Branch, Uppsala, SE-75124, Sweden

    Aristidis Moustakas

  8. Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 10065, New York, USA

    Theresa Vincent

  9. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Pharmacogenetics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden

    Etienne P. A. Neve

  10. Servicio de Anatomia Patologica, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain

    Federico Rojo

  11. Servei d'Oncologia Patologica, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

    Joan Albanell

  12. Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Matrix Division, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 17177, Sweden

    Jill R. Johnson, Kristian Pietras & Jonas Fuxe

Authors
  1. Theresa Vincent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Etienne P. A. Neve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jill R. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexander Kukalev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Federico Rojo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joan Albanell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kristian Pietras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ismo Virtanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lennart Philipson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Philip L. Leopold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ronald G. Crystal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Antonio Garcia de Herreros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Aristidis Moustakas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Ralf F. Pettersson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jonas Fuxe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.V., E.P.A.N. and J.F. initiated the research, designed experiments and analysed data. T.V., E.P.A.N. and J.R.J. performed the in vitro experiments and discussed and analysed data. J.F. supervised the work and wrote the manuscript. T.V., E.P.A.N. and J.R.J. provided substantial input into preparation of the manuscript. F.R. and J.A. performed studies involving human tumours and analysed data. A.G.deH. designed and supervised studies on the human tumour samples. A.M. initiated experiments and discussed data involving SMADs. A.K. worked on protein interactions. K.P. performed experiments and analysed data from the mouse model. I.V. provided essential reagents. L.P., R.F.P., P.L.L. and R.G.C. discussed data, initiated experiments and provided significant intellectual contributions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Fuxe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1750 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vincent, T., Neve, E., Johnson, J. et al. A SNAIL1–SMAD3/4 transcriptional repressor complex promotes TGF-β mediated epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat Cell Biol 11, 943–950 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1905

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1905

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing