Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:45:33.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pathogens in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Intensive Care Unit–Acquired Pneumonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

K. M. C. Verhamme*
Affiliation:
Departments of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Onze Lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
W. De Coster
Affiliation:
Departments of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Onze Lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium Nutrition, Onze Lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
L. De Roo
Affiliation:
Intensive Care, Onze Lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
H. De Beenhouwer
Affiliation:
Microbiology, Onze Lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
G. Nollet
Affiliation:
Intensive Care, Onze Lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
J. Verbeke
Affiliation:
Intensive Care, Onze Lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
I. Demeyer
Affiliation:
Intensive Care, Onze Lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
P. Jordens
Affiliation:
Departments of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Onze Lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
*
Onze Lieve Vrouw ziekenhuis, Department of Infection Control and Epidemiology, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 Aalst, Belgium (Katia.Verhamme@olvz-aalst.be)

Abstract

Objectives.

To compare the type of pathogens isolated from patients with early-onset intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired pneumonia with those isolated from patients with late-onset ICU-acquired pneumonia and to study risk factors for the isolation of pathogens that are potentially resistant to multiple drugs.

Design.

Prospective cohort study.

Setting.

Patients admitted to the ICU of a 677-bed, university-affiliated teaching hospital in Belgium during 1997-2002.

Methods.

ICU-acquired pneumonia was defined as a case of pneumonia that occurred 2 days or more after admission to the ICU in combination with a positive results of radiologic analysis, clinical signs and symptoms, and a positive culture result. All cases of pneumonia were categorized as either early onset (within 7 days after admission) and late onset (7 days or more after admission), with or without previous antibiotic treatment, and the corresponding pathogens were analyzed. Risk factors for the isolation of pathogens potentially resistant to multiple drugs (ie, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Enterobacter species, Morganella morganii, methicillin-resistant Stapylococcus aureus, Citrobacter species, Acinetobacter species, Burkholderia species, extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing pathogens, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) were analyzed using logistic regression analysis.

Results.

A total of 4,200 patients stayed at the ICU for 2 or more days, 298 of whom developed ICU-acquired pneumonia, for an overall incidence of 13 cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 11-14 cases) per 1,000 ICU-days. Pathogens potentially resistant to multiple drugs were isolated from 52% of patients with early-onset pneumonia. Risk factors for the isolation of these pathogens were greater age and previous receipt of antibiotic prophylaxis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.6 [95% CI, 1.6-13.0]) or antibiotic therapy (aOR, 8.2 [95% CI, 2.8-23.8]). The length of ICU admission and hospital stay were weaker risk factors for the isolation of these pathogens.

Conclusions.

Pathogens potentially resistant to multiple drugs were isolated in 52% of cases of early-onset ICU-acquired pneumonia. Previous antibiotic use (both prophylactic and therapeutic) is the main risk factor for the isolation of these pathogens.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bowton, DL. Nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU—year 2000 and beyond. Chest 1999;115:28S33S.Google Scholar
2.Vincent, JL, Bihari, DJ, Suter, PM, et al.The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA 1995;274:639644.Google Scholar
3.Leroy, O, Soubrier, S. Hospital-acquired pneumonia: risk factors, clinical features, management, and antibiotic resistance. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2004;10:171175.Google Scholar
4. National Surveillance of Infection in Hospitals Web site. Available at: http://www.nsih.be. Accessed February 16, 2007.Google Scholar
5.Hoffken, G, Niederman, MS. Nosocomial pneumonia: the importance of a de-escalating strategy for antibiotic treatment of pneumonia in the ICU. Chest 2002;122:21832196.Google Scholar
6.Infectious Diseases Advisory Board. Diagnosis and Antibacterial Treatment of VAP. Belgium; 2002.Google Scholar
7.Trouillet, JL, Chastre, J, Vuagnat, A, et al.Ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by potentially drug-resistant bacteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:531539.Google Scholar
8. Hospitals in Europe Link for Infection Control Through Surveillance Web site. Available at: http://helics.univ-lyonl.fr/home.htm. Accessed February 16, 2007.Google Scholar
9.Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:388416.Google Scholar
10.Park, DR. The microbiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respir Care 2005;50:742765.Google Scholar
11.Bonten, MJ, Bergmans, DC, Ambergen, AW, et al.Risk factors for pneumonia, and colonization of respiratory tract and stomach in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:13391346.Google Scholar
12.Chevret, S, Hemmer, M, Carlet, J, Langer, M. Incidence and risk factors of pneumonia acquired in intensive care units: results from a multicenter prospective study on 996 patients. European Cooperative Group on Nosocomial Pneumonia. Intensive Care Med 1993;19:256264.Google Scholar
13.George, DL, Falk, PS, Wunderink, RG, et al.Epidemiology of ventilator-acquired pneumonia based on protected bronchoscopic sampling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:18391847.Google Scholar
14.Rello, J, Sa-Borges, M, Correa, H, Leal, SR, Baraibar, J. Variations in etiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia across four treatment sites: implications for antimicrobial prescribing practices. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:608613.Google Scholar
15.Ibrahim, EH, Ward, S, Sherman, G, Kollef, MH. A comparative analysis of patients with early-onset vs late-onset nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU setting. Chest 2000;117:14341442.Google Scholar
16.Akca, O, Koltka, K, Uzel, S, Cakar, N, et al.Risk factors for early-onset, ventilator-associated pneumonia in critical care patients: selected multiresistant versus nonresistant bacteria. Anesthesiology 2000;93:638645.Google Scholar
17.Leroy, O, Meybeck, A, d'Escrivan, T, Devos, P, Kipnis, E, Georges, H. Impact of adequacy of initial antimicrobial therapy on the prognosis of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:21702173.Google Scholar
18.Giantsou, E, Liratzopoulos, N, Efraimidou, E, et al.Both early-onset and late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia are caused mainly by potentially multiresistant bacteria. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:14881494.Google Scholar
19.Chastre, J, Fagon, JY. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:867903.Google Scholar
20.Fagon, JY, Chastre, J. Antimicrobial treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Clin Chest Med 2005;26:97104.Google Scholar
21.Niederman, MS. The clinical diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Respir Care 2005;50:788796.Google Scholar
22.Baughman, RP. Microbiologic diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Clin Chest Med 2005;26:8186.Google Scholar